Dr. Charan say so.

He said good person is ordinary man based on normal distribution

Exact words he was written in Th on pp 65 of his recent book entitle "parinya chevit chuan kid chuan kun":

Good person is ordinary person.

It contain both good and bad.

It has both good points and weak points mixed together.

Because they are ordinary man.

They are not "tewada"

TEWADA did not exist.

It may has ordinary man that not ordinary.

(it was exist at the both end of normal distribution)

================================

Above is my bad Eng translation.

If it was mis leading then it was totally my own fault.

 

The point is, even I used to be his advisee, I did not agree with him.

He wrote above words based on old model before "Reverse Threshold Model Theory (RTMT)" was born.

In Buddism what he wrote was called under "somutti sat ja"

(conventional model)

Under new "somutti sat ja" it do has other explaination.

However, what one is the correct one  only known by god.

 

Under RTMT:

1. yes, phenotype of human compose of infinite numbers of effects and have to follow CLT theorem. So, it was distributed as normal curve as he said.

2. but there always exist limiting factors to indicate whois good and whois bad. This effect was called "threshold" in RTMT

3. it has disturbance called "DDD" in model to make us to have incorrect decision who is good and who is bad.

 

Conclusion:

It was not extreme persons who is good or bad but simply any persons who classified under RTMT can be called good or bad correctly. Unfortunately, precise method to identify the good and the bad still did not exist.

 

If I found it out I will let you know.

Regards,

zxc555