trigger digits were successfully treated in 98% of the cases using the open surgical technique and in 100% of the cases using the percutaneous technique;

- Percutaneous Technique:
    - in the report by Gilberts et al, the authors compared the results of an open surgical technique with those of a percutaneous surgical
 technique for the treatment of trigger digits;
           - 96 patients with 100 trigger digits were randomized to either open (n = 46) or percutaneous (n = 54) surgical release of the first annular pulley;
           - trigger digits were successfully treated in 98% of the cases using the open surgical technique and in 100% of the cases using the percutaneous technique;
           - mean operation time was significantely longer using the open technique;
           - mean duration of postoperative pain and time to recovery of motor function
   Percutaneous release of the trigger finger: an office procedure <div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt; text-align: center"><hr width="100%" size="1" noshade></div>Eastwood-D-M. Gupta-K-J. Johnson-D-P. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Bristol, England. J-Hand-Surg-[Am]. 1992 Jan. 17(1). P 114-7. A new technique for percutaneous release of the trigger finger is described. A 21-gauge hypodermic needle is used to release the A1 pulley. The technique is effective, convenient, safe, and well tolerated by patients. Thirty-three of 35 procedures (94%) led to complete relief of symptoms, and in the remaining two digits partial symptomatic relief was achieved. There were no significant complications. After a mean follow-up of 13 months, there had been no recurrences. This technique should be the treatment of choice for the established trigger finger with symptoms of more than 4 months’ duration.