Case Law from International Court of Justice (ICJ) and Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ) -- E-L
E
East Timor (Portugal v. Australia), Judgment,
Effect of Awards of Compensation Made by the UN Administrative Tribunal, Advisory Opinion,
Electricité de Beyrouth, (France v. Lebanon), Company Case, Order of 20 October, 1953,
Electricité de Beyrouth Company, Order of 29 July 1954,
Electricity Company of Sofia and Bulgaria, Judgment 1939,
PCIJ Series A/B, No. 77, p. 64
Electricity Company of Sofia and Bulgaria, Order of 5 December 1939,
PCIJ Series A/B, No. 79, p. 194
Electricity Company of Sofia and Bulgaria, Order of 26 February 1940,
Elettronica Sicula S.P.A. (ELSI), Constitution of Chamber, Order of 2 March 1987,
Elettronica Sicula S.P.A. (ELSI), Constitution of Chamber, Order of 20 December 1988,
Elettronica Sicula S.P.A. (ELSI), Judgment,
Exchange of Greek and Turkish Populations, Advisory Opinion, 1925,
F
Factory at Chorzów (Jurisdiction), Judgment No. 8, 1927,
Factory at Chorzów (Indemnities), Order made on 21 November 1927,
Factory at Chorzów (Merits), Judgment No. 13, 1928,
Factory at Chorzów, Order made on 25 May 1929,
Fisheries Case, (United Kingdom v. Norway), Judgment,
Fisheries Jurisdiction (Federal Republic of Germany v. Iceland), Interim Protection,
Order of 17 August 1972,
Fisheries Jurisdiction (Federal Republic of Germany v. Iceland), Order of 18 August 1972,
Fisheries Jurisdiction (Federal Republic of Germany v. Iceland), Jurisdiction of the Court, Judgment,
Fisheries Jurisdiction (Federal Republic of Germany v. Iceland), Interim Protection, Order of 12 July 1973, ICJ Reports 1973, p. 313
Fisheries Jurisdiction (Federal Republic of Germany v. Iceland), Merits, Judgment,
Fisheries Jurisdiction (Spain v. Canada), Order of 2 May 1995,
Fisheries Jurisdiction (Spain v. Canada), Order of 8 May 1996,
Fisheries Jurisdiction (Spain v. Canada), Jurisdiction of the Court, Judgment,
Fisheries Jurisdiction, (United Kingdom v. Iceland), Interim Protection, Order of 17 August 1972,
Fisheries Jurisdiction, (United Kingdom v. Iceland), Order of 18 August 1972,
Fisheries Jurisdiction, (United Kingdom v. Iceland), Jurisdiction of the Court, Judgment,
Fisheries Jurisdiction, (United Kingdom v. Iceland), Interim Protection, Order of 12 July 1973,
Fisheries Jurisdiction, (United Kingdom v. Iceland), Merits, Judgment,
Free City of Danzig and ILO, Advisory Opinion 1930,
Free Zones of Upper Savoy and the District of Gex, Order made on 19 August 1929,
Free Zones of Upper Savoy and the District of Gex (second phase), Order made on 6 December 1930,
Free Zones of Upper Savoy and the District of Gex, Judgment, 1932,
PCIJ Series A/B, No. 46, p. 96
Frontier Dispute, Constitution of Chamber, Order of 3 April 1985,
Frontier Dispute, Provisional Measures, Order of 10 January 1986,
Frontier Dispute, Judgment,
Frontier Dispute, Nomination of Experts, Order of 9 April 1987,
Frontier Dispute (Benin/Niger), Formation of Chamber, Order of 27 November 2002,
Frontier Dispute (Benin/Niger), Order of 9 July 2004,
Frontier Dispute (Benin/Niger), Judgment,
G
Gabčikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia), Order of 5 February 1997,
Gabčikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia), Judgment,
German Settlers in Poland, Advisory Opinion,
Greco-Bulgarian "Communities", Advisory Opinion, 1930,
Guinea Bissau v. Senegal, Judgment,
H
Headquarters Agreement (cited as: Applicability, of the Obligation to Arbitrate under Section 21 of the United Nations Headquarters Agreement of 26 June 1947, Advisory Opinion,
Haya de la Torre Case, Judgment (Colombia v. Peru),
I
Interhandel, Interim Protection, Order of 24 October 1957,
Interhandel, Preliminary Objections, Judgment, (Switzerland v. US),
Interpretation of Article 3‚ Paragraph 2‚ of the Treaty of Lausanne, Advisory Opinion, 1925,
Interpretation of Judgment No.3 Judgment No. 4, 1925,
Interpretation of Judgments Nos. 7 and 8 (Factory at Chorzów), Judgment No. 11, 1927,
Interpretation of the Agreement of 25 March 1951, between the WHO and Egypt, Advisory Opinion,
Interpretation of the Greco-Bulgarian Agreement of 9 December 1927,Advisory Opinion 1932,
PCIJ Series A/B, No. 45, p. 68
Interpretation of Peace Treaties with Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania, First Phase, Advisory Opinion,
Interpretation of Peace Treaties with Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania, Advisory Opinion,
Interpretation of the Convention of 1919 concerning Employment of Women during the Night
Advisory Opinion, 1932,
PCIJ Series A/B, No. 50, p. 365
Interpretation of the Greco-Turkish Agreement of 1 December 1926 (Final Protocol‚ Article IV)
Advisory Opinion, 1928,
Interpretation of the Statute of the Memel Territory, Judgment, 1932,
PCIJ Series A/B, No. 49, p. 294
Interpretation of the Statute of the Memel Territory, Judgment, 1932,
PCIJ Series A/B, No. 47, p. 243
International status of South-West Africa, Advisory Opinion,
J
Jaworzina, Advisory Opinion, 1923,
Judgments of the Administrative Tribunal of the ILO upon Complaints Made against Unesco,
Advisory Opinion,
Jurisdiction of the Courts of Danzig, Advisory Opinion, 1928,
Jurisdiction of the European Commission of the Danube, Advisory Opinion, 1927,
K
Kasikili/Sedudu Island (Botwana v.Namibia), Judgment,
L
La Grand, (Germany v. United States of America),
La Grand, (Germany v. United States of America), Judgment,
Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria, Order of 16 June 1994,
Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria, Provisional Measures,
Order of 15 March 1996,
Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria, Preliminary Objections, Judgment,
Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria, Order of 30 June 1999,
Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria, (Cameroon v. Nigeria),
Order of 21 October 1999,
Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria (Cameroon v. Nigeria: Equatorial Guinea intervening), Order of 20 February 2001,
Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria (Cameroon v. Nigeria: Equatorial Guinea intervening), Judgment,
Land, Island and Maritime Frontier Dispute, (El Salvador/Honduras), Constitution of Chamber,
Order of 8 May 1987,
Land, Island and Maritime Frontier Dispute, (El Salvador/Honduras), Composition of Chamber, Order of 13 December 1989,
Land, Island and Maritime Frontier Dispute, (El Salvador/Honduras), Application to Intervene,
Order of 28 February, 1990,
Land, Island and Maritime Frontier Dispute, (El Salvador/Honduras), Application to Intervene, Judgment, ICJ Reports 1990, p. 92
Land, Island and Maritime Frontier Dispute, (El Salvador/Honduras: Nicaragua intervening), Judgment, ICJ Reports 1992, p. 351
Land, Island and Maritime Frontier Dispute: cited as Application for Revision of the Judgment of 11 September, 1992 in the case Concerning the Land, Ireland and Maritime Frontier Dispute (El Salvador v. Honduras: Nicaragua intervening) (El Salvador v. Honduras), Judgment
Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa), nothwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970), Orders Nos. 1, 2 and 3 of 26 January 1971,
ICJ Reports 1971, p. 3, ICJ Reports 1971, 6 and ICJ Reports 1971, p. 9
Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa), nothwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970), Order of 29 January 1971,
Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa), nothwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970), Advisory Opinion,
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory,
Order of 19 December 2003,
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Order of
30 January, 2004,
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports 2004, p. 136
Legal Status of Eastern Greenland, Judgment, 1933,
PCIJ Series A/B, No. 53, p. 22
Legal Status of the South-Eastern Territory of Greenland, Orders 2 and 3 August 1932,
PCIJ Series A/B, No. 48, p. 268
Legal Status of the South-Eastern Territory of Greenland, Order of 11 May 1933,
PCIJ Series A/B, No. 55, p. 157
Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Order of 1 February, 1995,
Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion,
Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Belgium), Preliminary Objections, Judgment,
Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Canada), Preliminary Objections, Judgment,
Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. France), Preliminary Objections, Judgment,
Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Germany), Preliminary Objections, Judgment,
Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Italy), Preliminary Objections, Judgment,
Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Netherlands), Preliminary Objections, Judgment,
Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Portugal), Preliminary Objections, Judgment,
Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. United Kingdom), Preliminary Objections, Judgment, ICJ Reports 2004, 1307
Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Spain), Provisional Measures, Order of 2 June 1999,
Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Belgium), Provisional Measures, Order of 2 June 1999,
Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Canada), Provisional Measures, Order of 2 June 1999,
Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. France), Provisional Measures, Order of 2 June 1999,
Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Germany), Provisional Measures, Order of 2 June 1999,
Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Italy), Provisional Measures, Order of 2 June 1999,
Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Netherlands), Provisional Measures, Order of 2 June 1999,
Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Portugal), Provisional Measures, Order of 2 June 1999,
Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Spain), Provisional Measures, Order of 2 June 1999,
Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. United Kingdom), Provisional Measures, Order of 2 June 1999,
Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. United States of America), Provisional Measures,
Order of 2 June 1999,
Legality of the Use by a State of Nuclear Weapons in Armed Conflict, Advisory Opinion,
Lighthouses case between France and Greece, Judgment 1934,
Lighthouses in Crete and Samos, Judgment 1937,
PCIJ Series A/B, No. 71, p. 94
Lockerbi: cited as: Case concerning questions of Interpretation and application of the 1971 Montreal Convention arising from the Aerial Incident at Lockerbie (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v. United Kingdom)
Lockerbie case: Questions of Interpretation and Application of the 1971 Montreal Convention arising from the Aerial Incident at Lockerbie, (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v. United States of America)
Losinger, Order of 27 June 1936,
Losinger, Order of 14 December 1936,
PCIJ Series A/B, No. 69, p. 99
"Lotus", Judgment No. 9, 1927,
ใน "Lessons Learned on Advocacy for Displaced and Stateless Persons"
ความเห็น (0)
ไม่มีความเห็น