I support discussions on “.. จริงหรือไม่ที่ครูและบุคลากรทางการศึกษาไทยถูกลดทอนมิติของความเป็นมนุษย์โดยไม่รู้ตัว จากระบบการศึกษาที่ตกอยู่ใต้วัฒนธรรมอำนาจ ..”
- 1) let’s define ‘dehumanization’ –any activity that degrades/deprives people of their positive qualities? Is there a list of examples?- 2) let’s define ‘วัฒนธรรมอำนาจ’ – ‘common’? practices that are based on inequality or hierarchy social structures? (including ‘class’, age, sex, income, residential location, duties and ranks or professions? Shall we list them in rank?- 3) let’s make a table (or matrix) of 1) x 2) (examples) –(we can assign weights for desirability and sum to a total value;) to see if any entry (cell, or ‘heading’) can be made ‘positive’ or ‘zero’ (removed) or less negative (reduced); (to a better sum)- 4) ‘class’ is a prevalent social structure of practice in not just among human but also among social animals (this says ‘power structures’ is common and hard to modify, as long as power gives higher benefit over ‘the mass’; democracy as modeled and used today is not an answer for equality)- 5) ‘self-actualizing individuals’ seems a possible candidate solution for ‘dehumanization’, but is individualistic and difficult to achieve and is against other mechanisms such as ‘order and rule’, ‘employer-employee’, ‘master-apprentice’, and so on - 6) thought experiments point to assessment of ‘.. โจทย์เรื่อง dehumanization นั้น เราไม่ทราบว่าเกิดขึ้นจริงไหม ต้องการการวิจัยหาข้อมูลหลักฐาน ..” and return of investment for such, as inclusion into the goal and objectives of research.