We can see that you are actively promoting Kolb’s Experiential Learn Cycle. I am wondering if there are cases of success of the methodology in Thailand (that examples of it working in Thailand’s context –where strict adherence to methodologies are often lacking –and that dressing up or make-over for the occasions is the norm). More importantly is an issue of preferential appearance or bias in management. Such inclination may and may not work with good intention but more likely would invite opportunistic involvements in the preferred guise which may hinder progress.

I think it is reasonable to experiment with KELC and learn from it and after reflecting and remodeling to fit available evidence then adopting/adapting it.

I think there are issues with reviewing and reflecting with different filtering lenses (we see things differently); issues with learning (we learn different things from the same lesson); issues with choosing what to try next (a quantum of options and interdependencies at states and phases of connected systems); and issues of scarce resources (time, expertise, collaboration, up-to-date data, …). These points impact scaling of the methodology to large and complex systems.