When we talk about ‘probability’, we often forget to include ‘ideal condition’ in which the event is to occur. Statistics also does not mention ‘catalyst’ –when a tiny sample can cause chain reactions in larger ‘population’.

Kamma is more interesting for our lives (or citta). We have intention, factors (including environment or space and time and results of other kammas) , action, result (phala -by the intention), and side effects (on actor and others). We usually think of kamma as a biased ‘deal’ or investment for profit (Expectation in Statistics?) and blame unexpected result on ‘bad luck’ (or other excuses).

A day will come when a course on Kamma is offered in universities along with ‘Statistics’. ;-)