Prof. George Coedes had died and can no longer defend himself.

The customary thing we should do is to present solid evidence to correct his work.

I think we don't have enough evidence to sway 'history'.

We need more to overcome 'ingrained inertia' (rusted position).

(I have doubts that Prof. Coedes had any stronger evidence, more likely he had less to make his thesis.)

Can anyone offer any help? In evidence or in different theories?