Thank you.

But I must say this is a very hard to understand 'essay'. Many interpretations/concepts are not 'commonsense' and/or commonly understood.

Many regards 'dhamma' in 3 aspects: Vinaya (or obeying rules -siilas); Sutta (examples and stories explaining points for study); and abhidhamma (the deep or pure dhamma) that deals with senses (ayatana); citta and cetasikas (awareness or mental process over certain mental factors in 'space and time' that advance to 'nibbaana'. [This sbhidhamma is considered by many the 'pure Buddhism'. The abstraction of mind and learning for ultimate knowledge.]

I think in a simplistic way - we have 'senses' as instruments for learning, we have cittas which are characterised by 'cetasikas', arise and cease at moments of our conscious time. Some knowing and/or attachments occur. That's how we learn. Understanding the instruments, their roles and processes, will in the end show 'the true nature of things' (anicca, dukkha, anatta).