"...บรรจุไว้ในรัฐธรรมนูญเลยว่าการใช้สารเคมีทุกชนิดในการผลิตพืชและสัตว์เป็นการผิดกฎหมาย มีโทษร้ายแรง ซึ่งเราจะเป็นประเทศแรกในโลกที่ทำเช่นนี้ เชื่อผมสิ มันจะกระหึ่มโลก และจะนำไปสู่สิ่งดีๆอีกมหาศาลอย่างที่คาดไม่ถึง..."

"...แล้วมีประเทศไหนบ้างไหมที่ไม่ใช้สารเคมีเลย หรือว่าใช้น้อยที่สุด..."

A recent research (by T. Hayes on frogs) suggests that "atrazine" (สารกำจัดวัชพืช ที่ราคาถูก) may interfere with sexual development during growth and cause body defects over many generations.

Similar research results on other animals support that chemicals used in farms may be more harmful to people, animals and the environment than what chemicals producing/selling companies say. One pregnant woman is heard saying she is worry about her "toxic baby" from many thousands of artificial chemicals introduced in our food and environment. She lost her first baby because of defects caused by some artificial chemicals.

Atrazine may also be a key factor causing breast cancers and prostrate cancers in rural areas.

Atrazine residuals get into ground water, rivers and estuaries.

The water supply for Bangkok comes mostly passing rural areas where atrazine has been (overly) used.

Gulf of Thailand has high level of atrazine. (Would fish from the GoT be safe to eat?)

Atrazine is banned in European Union.

Atrazine is listed as dangerous level III (unrestricted use) in Thailand. Atrazine is sold and used "without control".

Why is this? Surely Thai farmers deserve protection from harmful chemicals as any other people.

Can we imagine the world some 70 years ago (before the Green Revolution) where farms were run as a way of life not as chemical soup pots and chemical residual dry pans?

Yes, we can be free of 'artificial chemicals' like agent orange, atrazine, ... (see PCD database for the list of death agents). Yes, I agree as to a "constitutional right of people" to be protected from "artificially (created) chemicals".