The sweet potato brings into mind a notion of 'obesity in plants'.

Early this year, we had floods and a few months after that we had fruits of our land.

 

[The floorboards are 95mm wide. On the left of a 10kg pumpkin is a 11kg sweet potato (root). In the basket are a pineapple, oranges, avocados, passionfruits, and limes.]

 

The sweet potato brings into mind a notion of 'obesity in plants'. Yes, plants do get fat. Other questions like: how does obesity affect plants? What are 'normal sizes' for plants, fruits, roots? What things do they have more? Only water? Are these things good for eating or good for anything at all?

 

We learn from 'giant pumpkins' competitions that giant pumpkins are 'not' edible. These giant pumpkins are bred for size and given a lot of fertilizers or nutrients to grow fat. But, in the market we see that larger fruits and vegetables are more expensive. Why?

Why should we prefer 'fat' fruits and vegetables over 'normal' ones? What are 'right' sizes, anyway? Should we look into amounts of 'our nutritional requirements' in fruits and vegetables and pay for our 'food' by those amounts --rather than their obesity?

 

We have fruit trees and we pick our fruits when they are 'really' ripe. [Fruits in (super)markets are harvested (all fruits are picked) when a test sample from the whole orchard shows 'certain level of sugar statistically'. Usually, the fruits are a week from being fully ripe.] Our fruits taste sweeter and fuller. (All 'fruits of our labour' taste better anyway, right?) There are chemical differences between 'green' fruits and 'ripe' fruits. Animals (bats, birds, possums, rats and mice, horses, goats and many insects) prefer 'ripe' fruits. Why? Do they know something we don't (care)?

 

I don't have answers for these questions. Maybe your have something that we can learn. Let us know ;-)