I would like to mention some ideas from Dr. … , Liberal Art school’s lecturer Walailak Univ. , that I have gotten them after interviewing him yesterday ,pointing out the Thai context of a grass root ’s movement as a result of individual rights to create social justice base on the recognition of multiple forms of social diversity. He emphasized the Thailand democracy is an illusion that has been exposed—don’t blame Thai grass root heart & head ,we should really learn something and to relate to it all the rest by this principle : all men have equal intelligence—“Everything is in everything” (Jacques Ranciere , The Ignorant Schoolmaster, Five Lessons in Intellectual Emancipation).A strong point of this view , I go on to say something question whether you used to obvious “under all of aspects in many Thai situation divide group into two --divide intelligence into two as an inferior intelligence and a superior intelligence ”infact, The method of equality was above all a method of this view. One could learn by oneself and without a master explicator when one want to ,propelled by one’s own desire or by the constraint of the situation. Is this situation imply the Thailand democracy illusion ? I used to quest why someone criticize you ,but you can’t criticize him/her, why someone force you to do many things ,but it is meaningless that work would constitute self-reliance – am I the person whom is an inferior intelligence that can not act spontaneously,and so on.
อมตะพจนา(พุทธศาสนสุภาษิต)
ปญฺญา ว ธเนน เสยฺโย (ปัญญา แล ประเสริฐกว่าทรัพย์)
ปญฺ ญา เจน ปสาสติ (ปัญญาเป็นเครื่องคุ้มครองตัว)
If you are interested in an Ignorant Schoolmaster,you might read
" the Ignorant Schoolmaster",Jacques Ranciere , Five Lessons in Intellectual Emancipationthese , Standford University Press , Standford California ,1991.
ไม่มีความเห็น